REVIEWERS

LEONEN CASE DOCTRINES IN LEGAL ETHICS By. ATTY. BALMES

EHB-HANDOUT-IN-LEGAL-ETHICS-LEONEN-CASE-DOCTRINES-EHBalmes.pdf

2022/01/BALMES-2022-PRE-WEEK-IN-LEGAL-AND-JUDICIAL-ETHICS-FOR-SHARING-TO-ALL-AMDG-AS-OF-JANUARY-11-2022.pdf

Criminal Law

Remedial Law 2019

Atty. Elmer P. Brabante

Civil Law

AUF School of Law-Obligations and Contracts-Jurado Reviewer.pdf

Labor Law

Political Law

Mercantile Law

Taxation

Remedial Law

Criminal Procedure Reviewer

Credits go to the Author/s

Provisional Remedies Outline of Jurisdiction

JUDICIARY

Credits go to the Author/s


DOWNLOAD

 

APPEALS and REMEDIES

Credits to the Author


DOWNLOAD

REMEDIAL LAW
REVIEWER(Preliminaries)

Atty. Emile Justin D. Cebrian

REMEDIAL LAW
REVIEWER(CivPro)

Associate Solicitor Emile Justin D. Cebrian

Red Notes in Remedial Law

Credits to the Owner


DOWNLOAD

UP UPDATES ON CRITICAL AREAS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE 2015 by ATTY. CHRISTIAN VILLASIS

VILLASIS UPDATES ON CRITICAL AREAS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE (UP) 2015

Criminal Law

FREQUENTLY ASKED OBJECTIVE QUESTIONS IN CRIMINAL LAW

Red Notes Criminal Law


DOWNLOAD

Codal and Notes in CRIMINAL LAW BOOK

Rene Callanta

Political Law

Atty. Edwin Rey Sandoval


DOWNLOAD

Civil Law

Persons and Family Relations

Atty. Ed Albano and all authors


DOWNLOAD

Top Provisions in CIVIL LAW

Credits go to the Author/s


DOWNLOAD

OBLICON – Reviewer

Credits to the Owner/s

ObliCon Reviewer

Mercantile Law

Mercantile Law Reviewer

Prof. Maria Zarah R. Villanueva Castro


DOWNLOAD

2019 HANDOUT IN COMMERCIAL LAW, ESTELA PERLAS BERNABE CASES, as of MAY 20, 2019 Compiled by PROF. E.H. BALMES

DOWNLOAD

2019 HANDOUT IN LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS, ESTELA PERLAS BERNABE CASES, as of JUNE 20, 2019 Compiled by PROF. E.H. BALMES

2019 J. ESTELA PERLAS-BERNABE CASES AS OF JUNE 20 2019 LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS -E. BALMES

53 FREQUENTLY ASKED PROVISIONS OF THE CORPORATION CODE

Credits go to the Author/s


DOWNLOAD

PALS Compiled Jurisprudence

RECENT JURISPRUDENCE TAX

Taxation April 2014 to March 2015 Jurisprudence

Credits to PALS


DOWNLOAD

RECENTJURIS REMEDIAL LAW

Remedial Law April 2014 to March 2015 Jurisprudence

Credits to PALS


DOWNLOAD

RECENTJURIS MERCANTILE LAW

Mercantile Law April 2014 to March 2015 Jurisprudence

Credits to PALS


DOWNLOAD

RECENTJURIS POLITICAL LAW

Mercantile Law April 2014 to March 2015 Jurisprudence

Credits to PALS


DOWNLOAD

RECENT JURISPRUDENCE LABOR LAW

Labor Law April 2014 to March 2015 Jurisprudence

Credits to PALS


DOWNLOAD

RECENT JURISPRUDENCE LEGAL ETHICS

Legal Ethics April 2014 to March 2015 Jurisprudence

Credits to PALS


DOWNLOAD

RECENT JURISPRUDENCE CRIMINAL LAW

Criminal Law April 2014 to March 2015 Jurisprudence

Credits to PALS


DOWNLOAD

RECENT JURISPRUDENCE CIVIL LAW

Civil Law April 2014 to March 2015 Jurisprudence

Credits to PALS


DOWNLOAD

1 thought on “REVIEWERS

  1. My hope is that my comment might assist myself and my children by politely conveying our desperate need for legal support and knowledge for Upholding Judicial Integrity Through Rule 60(d)(3): A Call for Accountability

    I am currently engaged in a legal effort to vacate a judgment obtained through fraud on the court, pursuant to Rule 60(d)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This is not a routine motion to reconsider—it addresses a fundamental breach of judicial integrity caused by deliberate misconduct perpetrated by officers of the court. The fraudulent conduct in question not only deprived me of due process, but it also threatened the sanctity of the court itself by concealing material facts and misrepresenting the truth in a manner that corrupted the adjudicative process.

    My work focuses on identifying authoritative precedent and uncovering procedural patterns that support relief in cases where fraud undermines the fairness of legal outcomes. The challenge lies not only in proving fraud, but in demonstrating how such fraud strikes at the heart of the judicial machinery—beyond mere injury to an individual party.

    This endeavor is about more than correcting a flawed judgment. It is a principled stand for transparency, accountability, and the ethical duty that all officers of the court owe to the justice system. A court’s legitimacy hinges on its commitment to truth and impartiality. Where that commitment is betrayed, Rule 60(d)(3) exists not just as a remedy, but as a safeguard against systemic erosion.

    I share my experience here in the hope that others who confront similar obstacles may feel empowered to act, and that the legal community continues to place integrity above expediency.

    I pray for your knowledgeable feedback and personal acquaintance.

    Most Sincerely,
    Lisa A. Zepeda

Leave a Reply to Lisa A Zepeda Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *